Joint Statement on Revision of the Road Infrastructure Safety Management Directive 2008/96

Joint Statement on Revision of the Road Infrastructure Safety Management Directive 2008/96

Introduction

Improving infrastructure is a cornerstone of road safety and will be critical to achieving the EU’s new road safety targets for 2030 and implementing a Safe System approach across the road network. The road system should be safe for use by every road user in every EU member state.

We, the undersigned, welcome the current revision of the Road Infrastructure Safety Management Directive 2008/96 (RISM) and call for the inclusion of the following recommendations.

  1. Extension of the scope of Road Infrastructure Safety Management

We support the EC proposal to:

  • Extend and revise the application of the instruments of the Directive to cover all roads which are part of the TEN-T network, motorways and all primary roads;
  • Apply the instruments of the RISM Directive to any road infrastructure project outside urban areas completed using EU funding.

We furthermore call for:

  • Extending the application of the Directive to cover all main urban and main rural roads.
  • Extend the application of the Directive to cover all EU (co-) financed road improvement schemes, including urban roads.

The Directive would have the highest potential if extended to the non-TEN-T network, where the majority of severe and fatal collisions occur.[1] Only 8% of deaths occur on the motorway, 37% in urban areas and 55% on rural non-motorways.[2]

Infrastructure safety needs budgets and programmes proportionate to the value of preventing road collision costs.[3] Cost benefit analysis of road safety audits and inspections was carried out and found to have a benefit-to-cost ratio greater than 1.[4]

EU funds should never be used to build or upgrade unsafe roads.

  1. Network Wide Assessment

We support the EC proposal to:

  • Introduce or strengthen existing Network Wide Road Assessments and review findings regularly for action.

We furthermore call for:

  • Inclusion of the data about pedestrian/cycling infrastructure and traffic in the Network Wide Road Assessments in line with the Annex.

The safety of road infrastructure across the EU should be measured using a comparable method agreed at EU level with targets then set for improvement. Collecting data about infrastructure and traffic, including pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as well as existing and potential pedestrian and bicycle traffic, will form a basis for more evidence-based policies.

  1. Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Safety

We support the EC proposal to:

  • Adapt the current procedures so they also apply to the needs of all VRUs, keeping in mind that each of the groups (pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists) has its own specific requirements.

The RISM Directive’s procedures for design, construction and maintenance should be reinforced to meet the needs of each of the VRU groups.

  1. Roads that Cars can Read: Road Markings and Road Signs

We support the EC proposal to:

  • Develop EU general performance requirements on road markings and road signs in maintenance budgets to achieve optimal performance of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), such as Lane Departure Warning and Traffic Sign Recognition.

We furthermore call for:

  • Setting minimum performance standards for road markings and road signs to facilitate recognition both by human drivers and connected and autonomous vehicles.

In-vehicle safety technologies which rely on road markings and traffic signs are increasingly common. Semi-automated or fully-automated vehicles will rely on readable road infrastructure for safe driving and the application of the new technologies.

  1. Follow-up to Road Safety Inspections

We support the EC proposal to:

  • Ensure appropriate follow-up to road safety inspections by means of reasoned decisions determining if remedial action is necessary. If no action is taken, then an explanation should be given as to why the issue is not considered as deserving intervention.
  • Set-up and regularly update a risk-based, prioritised action plan to track the implementation of identified remedial actions.
  1. Road Work Zone Safety
  • Work towards higher standards and guidance nationally and across the EU concerning road work zones.

Risks involved with work zones can include the risk of collisions between general road users (vehicles, pedestrians) and barriers, equipment, vehicles or personnel. Work zones represent an obstacle for connected and autonomous vehicles due a major change of the environment. From the worker safety viewpoint, the risks involved with work zones can include risk of collisions in or outside the work zone. The collisions can happen with passing vehicles or works vehicles and machines.

  1. Road Safety Auditors and Inspectors
  • Require that RSIs are carried out by certified auditors only, and that the inspecting team is led by an independent auditor.
  • Support the creation of a Forum of European Road Safety Auditors, on adoption of the new Directive as suggested by the EC under the EU Strategic Action Plan.[5]
  1. Development of Technical Guidance on Infrastructure Safety Management
  • Set EU guidelines for promoting best practice in traffic calming measures.
  • Set EU guidelines implementing the concept of ‘self-explaining’ and ‘self-enforcing’ roads, matching speed limits and road characteristics and functions with one another.
  • Set EU guidelines concerning harmonised, higher standard management of high risk sites.
  • Set EU guidelines for minimum quality criteria for cycling and pedestrian infrastructure.
  1. Tunnel Safety

We support the EC proposal to:

  • Include joint road safety inspections of transition areas by the competent authorities between the roads covered by the Infrastructure Safety Management Directive 2008/96 and road tunnels covered by the tunnel safety Directive 2004/54.
  1. Transparency and Information for Citizens
  • Reports on the procedures as well as resulting measures should be made publicly available to affected citizens.

Signed

Mr. Antonio Avenoso, Executive Director, European Transport Safety Council (ETSC)

Mr. Bernhard Ensink, Secretary General, European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF)

Mr. Christophe Nicodème, General Director, European Union Road Federation (ERF)

Mr. Eduardo Chagas, Secretary General, European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF)

Mr. Paolo Cestra, President, TISPOL

[1] TML (2014), Study of the effectiveness and on the improvement of the EU legislative framework on road infrastructure safety management (Directive 2008/96/EC), Ex-Post Evaluation https://goo.gl/nhPjDs

[2]European Commission https://goo.gl/TtzP54

[3] Ministerial Conference on Road Safety 29.03.2017. Valletta, Malta, Rapporteurs’ Reports from the Stakeholders’ Conference. 28 March 2017 https://goo.gl/Hb9Ux6

[4] Elvik et. Al (2004) Handbook of Road Safety Measures

[5] European Commission (2018) Communication Sustainable Mobility for Europe: Safe, Connected and Clean Annex 1 EU Strategic Action Plan on Road Safety https://bit.ly/2Kzlq2E

Download
Share this Post: Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Related Posts

Comments are closed.